In an opinion, it’s true that the Dutch don’t have to compromise their wealth in order to pursue green systems. Their approach reflects an ideological—perhaps even idealistic—fusion of aesthetics, both cultural and environmental. In Dutch society, the aesthetics of civilization include both urban development and green spaces.
For example, many Muslims are drawn to the Netherlands and adapt well to life there. They move because they appreciate the prosperity and see it as a place where they can thrive. The Netherlands provides an environment in which people can realize their potential. The national standard of living is high and firmly upheld by the government—no one wants to fall below it. The same applies to Luxembourg, and Belgium is making efforts in this direction as well.
In contrast, many Czechs are skeptical of the West—partly because of its emphasis on renewable energy, sustainability, and ecological policies. They perceive these as restrictions. However, given that Czechs are significantly poorer than the average Dutch citizen, their argument doesn’t hold up. What they seem to fear is not so much environmental restrictions, but rather the loss of the freedom to indulge in the forms of social and environmental toxicity that are commonplace in the Czech Republic.
They also often interpret sustainability as an economic limitation. But that idea is unfounded—especially when the Dutch, who enjoy far higher living standards, clearly aren’t held back by their green initiatives. On the contrary, the Netherlands demonstrates that sustainable development and high living standards can go hand in hand. Perhaps, truth is also, for the Netherlands is easier use wind power, for instance, for energy supply due Dutch geographic condition. Historically, windmills are symbol of the Netherlands. But Dutch renewable system is not just about windmills. It’s a profound system.
In an opinion, Germany was also open to Muslim immigration for economic reasons. Many Muslims contribute significantly to economic growth. On the other hand, Germany has not shown the same openness toward Eastern Europe—especially its eastern regions. This explains, in part, the tightening of borders with countries like the Czech Republic, where ironically, some eastern communities integrate more naturally into society.
Frankly, I’m not surprised by what Germany chooses. The real issue is that many people don’t seem to understand themselves. They constantly emphasize how different they are from the more Western parts of Europe, yet fail to reflect on the implications. I even heard that the borders were closed because of Sidney SN—a comment that, in its own way, highlights the underlying cultural rift. During and after the pandemic, the Czech Republic only deepened this divide through its own actions.
In an opinion, from Germany’s perspective, distancing itself from it is a logical and legitimate move—especially when there is attitude poses a potential threat to the values and stability of the West.
From what I’ve observed in the Netherlands, those who often struggle the most with integration aren’t Muslim or Black Dutch citizens, but rather people from Eastern side of Europe. Due to their cultural background, they often lack the inclusive mindset that characterizes other minority communities. Unlike Muslim or Black communities who have, over time, become an integral part of Dutch society, many Eastern side Europeans remain culturally distant.
Take South Holland as an example—modern-day Zuid-Holland wouldn’t exist in its current form without its diverse communities. These people are the Netherlands today. If they were to leave, the country would face a serious economic downturn. Cities like Rotterdam would be half-abandoned. The economic vitality of the Netherlands is deeply tied to these communities.
In a broader sense, Germany is facing a problem similar to Ukraine’s. The Czech Republic serves as a kind of tool or staging ground for potential opposition against Germany—paralleling the strategic role Ukraine plays. That’s the core reality. Ukraine is holding the line to prevent exactly that kind of scenario from unfolding against Germany and Western Europe. It’s as if a system was put in place—during and after the pandemic—to weaken potential resistance within certain parts of Czech society in the event of aggression toward Germany and the West.