⸻ The Spectacle of Destruction





    In the sprawling universe of drum and bass, few subgenres stand in such stark contrast as neurofunk and liquid. While both reside under the same rhythmic architecture of 174 BPM and intricate breakbeats, their philosophical cores couldn’t be more different. 

Neurofunk is often heralded for its technical complexity and futuristic aggression, but from a liquid drum and bass perspective—a genre rooted in emotional resonance, musicality, and human warmth—neurofunk can appear not just as a deviation, but a distortion. 

Liquid drum and bass emerged as a soulful counterbalance to the darker, more abrasive tendencies of early techstep and jungle. With its lush pads, jazzy chords, melancholic vocals, and harmonically rich textures, liquid offers listeners a space to feel, reflect, and connect. It’s music that breathes. Neurofunk, in contrast, feels engineered. Defined by cold, metallic basslines, relentless sound design, and a kind of dystopian futurism, neurofunk often seems more interested in impressing the mind than touching the heart. Its obsession with technical precision frequently comes at the expense of musicality. To the liquid purist, neurofunk can feel like a closed circuit—flawless in construction, but lifeless in essence. 

Liquid invites introspection. It’s a sonic sanctuary that fosters emotional release and community healing. In contrast, neurofunk often feels like an escape into a synthetic, hyper-violent vision of the future—an aesthetic shaped more by video game warfare and cybernetic paranoia than by real-world emotional landscapes. This matters because music is not just entertainment; it is a cultural mirror. While liquid offers a response to the alienation of the modern world by rekindling emotional honesty, neurofunk leans into that alienation, amplifying it. It’s the sound of a society accelerating into a post-human abyss, where feeling is replaced by function and empathy by efficiency. 

At many drum and bass events today—especially festivals—neurofunk dominates the main stages. Its theatrical drops and aggressive energy easily feed into the spectacle-driven nature of commercial rave culture. But this prominence comes at a cost. Liquid, with its subtleties and emotional nuance, is often sidelined or tokenized. This reflects a broader cultural dynamic: the spectacle devours the sincere. The same forces that push artists toward mass appeal and social media virality reward neurofunk’s sensory overload, while ignoring the slow-burn storytelling of a well-crafted liquid tune. 

If drum and bass is to remain a culture of depth rather than just noise, then its subgenres must be held accountable to more than just their technical polish. Liquid stands as a reminder that music can still be human in an increasingly post-human world. That it can still speak not just to the algorithm or the dancefloor, but to the soul. And in this light, neurofunk is not just another style—it is a challenge.